<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huffington Post says Sibelius is &#8220;a technological wonder&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sibeliusblog.com/opinion/huffington-post-says-sibelius-is-a-technological-wonder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sibeliusblog.com/opinion/huffington-post-says-sibelius-is-a-technological-wonder/</link>
	<description>From the desk of Sibelius&#039;s Product Manager</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:21:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Spreadbury</title>
		<link>http://www.sibeliusblog.com/opinion/huffington-post-says-sibelius-is-a-technological-wonder/comment-page-1/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Spreadbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sibeliusblog.com/?p=993#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>Hey, it wasn&#039;t me who called Sibelius a technological wonder! (Though secretly I agree that it is!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it wasn&#8217;t me who called Sibelius a technological wonder! (Though secretly I agree that it is!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sibelius user</title>
		<link>http://www.sibeliusblog.com/opinion/huffington-post-says-sibelius-is-a-technological-wonder/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>Sibelius user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sibeliusblog.com/?p=993#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>I know that any successful blog must have controversial headlines, but I disagree that Sibelius is a &quot;wonder&quot;, let alone a technological one. It&#039;s merely an example what happens when you have good people who set themselves ambitious goals and maintain a high quality and integrity in all their efforts for a very long time. No magic is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that any successful blog must have controversial headlines, but I disagree that Sibelius is a &#8220;wonder&#8221;, let alone a technological one. It&#8217;s merely an example what happens when you have good people who set themselves ambitious goals and maintain a high quality and integrity in all their efforts for a very long time. No magic is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Gruberman</title>
		<link>http://www.sibeliusblog.com/opinion/huffington-post-says-sibelius-is-a-technological-wonder/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gruberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sibeliusblog.com/?p=993#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Daniel, for that vote of confidence! Actually I wanted to say a lot more about Sibelius, but I decided to save that for another column completely devoted to the subject. And THAT one is going to rock! :) I see it as an &#039;education and advocacy&#039; piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Daniel, for that vote of confidence! Actually I wanted to say a lot more about Sibelius, but I decided to save that for another column completely devoted to the subject. And THAT one is going to rock! <img src='http://www.sibeliusblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I see it as an &#8216;education and advocacy&#8217; piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

